Subject	controled as is:
Posted by	Rickytl (MA) on December 20, 2005 at 12:33 PM
	This message has been viewed 30 times.
In Reply To	I've found good value in the oldest (and now only ~$30) posted by Scotts94z32 on December 20, 2005 at 11:48 AM
Message	flat level and straight or abandoned ?? *****Disclaimer - My spelling is horrific! i appologise in advance :)****** -RickyTL (MA)-
Follow Ups	NZR:Gtech's, are they worth anything of what they cost (n/m) - Rickytl (MA) 11:39:37 12/20/05 (sigh) Over 34,000 hits and doesn't know how to use - Dave N 11:44:14 12/20/05 i did exactly that and got mixed reviews (n/m) - Rickytl (MA) 12:27:58 12/20/05 Just keeping you on your toes :-) (n/m) - Dave N 13:33:02 12/20/05 oh dave u had me at "(sigh)" (n/m) - Rickytl (MA) 19:15:39 12/20/05 I've found good value in the oldest (and now only ~$30) - Scotts94z32 11:48:37 12/20/05 controled as is: - Rickytl (MA) 12:33:20 12/20/05 All of the above, with abandoned and the SAME road being - Scotts94z32 14:34:41 12/20/05 I used my buddys 1st gen Gtech before and - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 12:42:58 12/20/05 BTW, the MPH was on stock turbos - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 12:44:44 12/20/05 Mathematically they shouldn't be the same. The G-Tech is - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 14:03:07 12/20/05 My Gen1 G-tech is always a few mph higher than actual traps - Scotts94z32 14:32:52 12/20/05 i have the 1st gen/older version as well - Max865(ATL) 15:33:07 12/20/05 Under 13s and it gets out of spec a bit... - Scotts94z32 10:27:25 12/21/05 Take it to the track - s3trios 12:32:30 12/20/05 i supose ur right, this just seems more convenient(sp?) (n/m) - Rickytl (MA) 12:34:49 12/20/05 and cheaper (n/m) - komplexZTT 12:42:19 12/20/05 Safer, yes. Quicker, no. Cheaper, not exactly. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 14:35:29 12/20/05 lol. - Kenny 16:45:29 12/20/05 and safer (n/m) - kuah@splparts.com 13:16:31 12/20/05 I've searched and found most people say they coorelate - BigTDogg (MA) 12:38:34 12/20/05 I have the old one and it's junk. - just4kinks 12:53:10 12/20/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.